Patricia K. Kubow, Allison H. Blosser Introduction. Framing the Teaching Comparative Education Terrain: the need for critical agency in teacher education, 7-17
PART I: IDEOLOGICAL AND CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE OF COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION
Robert F. Arnove, Barry L. Bull The Roles of the Social Sciences and Philosophy in Teaching Comparative Education, 19-40
Michael Crossley Reconceptualising the Teaching of Comparative and International Education, 41-55
Erwin H. Epstein Why Comparative and International Education? Reflections on the Conflation of Names, 57-73
Patricia K. Kubow, Allison H. Blosser Multicultural Education is Not Enough: the case for comparative education in preservice teacher education, 75-90
PART 2: AIMS AND PURPOSES OF COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION
Karen L. Biraimah From Parochialism to Globalism: infusing comparative and international education through study abroad in teacher education programs, 91-111
Irving Epstein Comparative Education at the Undergraduate Level: affirming liberal inquiry as an alternative to the professional teacher education model, 113-132
Maria Manzon Comparative Educations to What Ends?, 133-150
PART 3: SOCIOPOLITICAL TRENDS AND ISSUES INFLUENCING PRACTICE OF COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION
Noah W. Sobe Comparative Education, Globalization and Teaching with/against the Nation-State, 151-162
Carlos Alberto Torres Teaching Comparative Education: the dialectics of the global and the local, 163-181
Marcelo Parreira do Amaral, Sabine Hornberg Teaching Comparative and International Education: bridging social demands for practical performance-based competencies with critical reflectivity, 183-201
David Phillips Teaching Comparative Education: a personal afterword, 203-208
Notes on Contributors, 209-212
Introduction. Framing the Teaching Comparative Education Terrain: the need for critical agency in teacher education
Patricia K. Kubow, Allison H. Blosser
Introduction
^^ Back to contents list
PART I: IDEOLOGICAL AND CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE OF COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION
The Roles of the Social Sciences and Philosophy in Teaching Comparative Education
Robert F. Arnove, Barry L. Bull
The authors propose an approach to the teaching of comparative education that emphasizes simultaneously the descriptive and normative aspects of education. This approach introduces students to philosophical frameworks that philosophers have developed recently that are universal but not comprehensive. These frameworks argue that certain core values are valid universally, for example, freedom and dignity. The values that fall outside this core are, then, appropriately determined by local and cultural considerations, and even with such universal values, localities can seek to achieve them in ways that are true to their transnational meaning but are locally appropriate. The approach then demonstrates how case studies based on social science can be developed to enable the application of the philosophical frameworks. For the purposes of this chapter, the authors have selected the case of South Africa for analysis.
^^ Back to contents list
Reconceptualising the Teaching of Comparative and International Education
Michael Crossley
This chapter examines how the teaching of comparative and international education has evolved and been reconceptualised in the United Kingdom, and how this has been influenced by changes in the contemporary ideological landscape that have challenged the nature and place of all foundation studies in education. The analysis builds upon earlier work on the teaching of comparative education; it points to the growing importance of teaching that is related to programmes of research training; it highlights the enduring theme of education policy transfer; and it concludes by identifying three key challenges for both teaching and research within the field.
^^ Back to contents list
Why Comparative and International Education? Reflections on the Conflation of Names
Erwin H. Epstein
The proliferation of titles for coursework, programs and associations in our field is seemingly limitless. A student entering study in comparative education, international education, multicultural education, or any of the other related subjects confronts a bewildering array of names that often stand for the same field. In coursework, students are faced with either a comparative education in chaotic relationship with international education or a unitary field without formal association with kindred fields. This chapter, based on the George Kneller Lecture at the 2016 Meeting of the Comparative and International Education Society, addresses how the very name of the Society has raised uncertainty about the nature of the field itself.
^^ Back to contents list
Multicultural Education is Not Enough: the case for comparative education in preservice teacher education
Patricia K. Kubow, Allison H. Blosser
This chapter argues that multicultural education is not enough to develop globally aware teachers. The authors make the case that comparative education is as relevant, if not more so, to teacher education than multicultural education. Drawing upon Patricia Kubow and Paul Fossum’s (2003, 2007) definition of comparative education as awareness and understanding of the theoretical and philosophical assumptions underlying educational issues and reforms in various nations to inform educational practice in one’s own context, the authors note that it is rare to find a comparative education course taught at the undergraduate level in the United States. Graduates of Comparative and International Education programs therefore find themselves teaching multicultural-oriented courses as opposed to comparative education courses in teacher education programs. And, while many comparativists eschew the practical/utilitarian direction of teacher education in the USA and elsewhere, comparative education’s academic orientation is both its strength and its biggest limitation in the present teacher education climate.
^^ Back to contents list
PART 2: AIMS AND PURPOSES OF COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION
From Parochialism to Globalism: infusing comparative and international education through study abroad in teacher education programs
Karen L. Biraimah
This chapter suggests an alternate path to infusing Comparative and International Education within teacher education programs by merging traditional curriculum with innovative study abroad experiences. It will first argue why study abroad experiences are invaluable tools for sensitizing learners to complex and challenging intercultural and transnational societal issues. It will then demonstrate how these experiences can provide a deeper, more personalized understanding of issues related to culture, immigration, globalization, technology, economics, politics, and second-language acquisition that will allow future teachers to better prepare their students for the twenty-first century. While acknowledging the challenges that surround the development of truly transformational study abroad programs in emerging nations and elsewhere, the chapter concludes with the notion that current globalization trends dictate that institutions worldwide include cross-cultural, international and comparative education perspectives within initial teacher education programs, and that transformational study abroad programs are one tool for reaching this goal.
^^ Back to contents list
Comparative Education at the Undergraduate Level: affirming liberal inquiry as an alternative to the professional teacher education model
Irving Epstein
It is both paradoxical and ironic that the comparative education experience at the undergraduate level encourages students to engage in liberal inquiry at the cost of adhering to an insipid professionalism that characterizes typical teacher preparation programs. The cost of negotiating such competing frameworks is significant, particularly when the activities associated with comparative education study embrace every single high-impact learning experience that has been shown to be influential and transformative in one’s educational career. Acquiescence to the professional development model will never guarantee that teacher educators and future teachers will acquire the enhanced social status they seek. In addition, the needs of twenty-first-century US public school students demand that future teachers acquire broader competencies and understandings than those embedded in the professional teacher education model. As a result, the comparative education experience at the undergraduate level provides a template for needed teacher education reform that has heretofore been resisted or ignored.
^^ Back to contents list
Comparative Educations to What Ends?
Maria Manzon
This chapter seeks to elucidate the discourses about the aims and purposes of comparative education. Commencing with a philosophical review of the aims of education and of fields of comparative inquiry, it then examines how comparative educationists have intellectually constructed the field through their definitions of its purposes. Against this backdrop, the chapter examines the case of Singapore where, it is argued, comparative education is a mode of educational governance and is, paradoxically, extramural. The chapter concludes on a fairly open-ended note, raising questions about the worthwhile purposes of comparative education.
^^ Back to contents list
PART 3: SOCIOPOLITICAL TRENDS AND ISSUES INFLUENCING PRACTICE OF COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION
Comparative Education, Globalization and Teaching with/against the Nation-State
Noah W. Sobe
Calls to overcome methodological nationalism in the field of comparative education are misguided if they do not engage with the ways that both the ‘nation-state’ and a ‘globalized world’ postulate the social world as a single whole to begin with. This chapter proposes that it is necessary to teach comparative education both ‘with’ and ‘against’ the nation-state. Comparative education scholars should be equipped to analyze the ways that nationalizing elements get incorporated into educational assemblages. Students of comparative education should also be equipped to deconstruct national ‘facts’ both by grappling with heterogeneity and intra-national levels of analyses, as well as by interrogating spatiality and the politics of scale.
^^ Back to contents list
Teaching Comparative Education: the dialectics of the global and the local
Carlos Alberto Torres
This chapter claims that critical theorists teach from a perspective of social justice, and therefore they teach and conduct research to change the world, not simply to reproduce it. The challenges of our time persuaded many of us that teaching comparative education should be done addressing the context, promises and challenges of global citizenship education as an emerging focal point of the field. After proposing the central themes of his teaching philosophy – which may even problematize teaching for some colleagues – the author focuses on the ecology and intellectual architecture of one of the most used textbooks in comparative education, Arnove, Torres and Franz’s 'Comparative Education: the dialectics of the global and the local', a book already in its fourth edition and much translated. Translations deserve a special scrutiny in our teaching and research endeavors, and the author argues that translations imply border crossing among cultures, languages and histories. Finally, there is a focus on the concept of global citizenship education, which needs to be framed in the context of a new narrative about education, and particularly a critique of neoliberalism. Emphasizing the politicity of education, the author calls into question whether it is possible to fully dissociate the normative from the analytical in the construction of scientific thought. This issue raises the importance of the notion of a good society guiding the intellectual, theoretical, meta-theoretical and empirical analysis, and this thesis should be seriously considered in our classrooms and research.
^^ Back to contents list
Teaching Comparative and International Education: bridging social demands for practical performance-based competencies with critical reflectivity
Marcelo Parreira do Amaral, Sabine Hornberg
This chapter discusses some important issues and trends affecting Comparative and International Education (CIE) teaching and learning in German universities. It focuses on socio-political and cultural themes and trends that helped shape research foci in the field, on public and policy attention to the field during recent years, and on how CIE is taught in the academy. In addition, this contribution aims at reflecting on the potential (side) effects of the socio-political and cultural trends referred to in this chapter on the (self-)understanding of CIE as a field of scholarly inquiry in education as well as on CIE teaching and learning. The chapter concludes that the tensions identified in the long run deserve vigilant attention for understanding and shaping CIE as a field of scholarly inquiry, teaching and learning in education in Germany.
^^ Back to contents list
Teaching Comparative Education: a personal afterword
David Phillips
Afterword
^^ Back to contents list
Notes on Contributors
^^ Back to contents list